Canonical Name: | S4 0954+65 |
TeVCat Name: | TeV J0958+655 |
Other Names: | |
Source Type: | Blazar |
R.A.: | 09 58 47.00 (hh mm ss) |
Dec.: | +65 33 55.00 (dd mm ss) |
Gal Long: | 145.75 (deg) |
Gal Lat: | 43.13 (deg) |
Distance: | z=0.3694 |
Flux: | (Crab Units) |
Energy Threshold: | 150 GeV |
Spectral Index: | |
Extended: | No |
Discovery Date: | 2015-02 |
Discovered By: | MAGIC |
TeVCat SubCat: | Default Catalog |
Source Notes:
This sources was moved from the "Newly Announced" to the "Default"
catalogue on 190116 (
MAGIC Collaboration, 2018).
This detection was announced in by the
MAGIC Collaboration in an ATel:
- "S4 0954+65 is entered an exceptionally high state at optical and
near infrared frequencies (ATels #7057; #7055; #7046, #7001; #6996),
which triggered the MAGIC observations."
Source Position:
The position quoted is taken from
MAGIC Collaboration (2015):
- R.A. (J2000): 09 58 47.00
- Dec. (J2000): +65 33 55.00
Classification - FSRQ or BL Lac?:
After a review of the literature on 160915, prompted by reading
Tavecchio (2016), this source has been re-classified in TeVCat
as a blazar of unknown type. Previously, it had been classified as a
FSRQ.
A summary on its nature is given below.
From
Becerra Gonzalez et al. (2020):
- "Regarding the classification of the source, according to the EW at
rest frame measure for the Mg II line, it is < 5 Angstroms and
therefore, the source can be classified as a BL Lac object. However,
it is close to the limit of 5 Angstroms, possibly being consistent
with the existence of a weak BLR"
- "From the optical spectra presented in this work we can derive the
expected luminosity of the BLR and the torus in order to compare it
with the photon field needed to explain its MWL SED."
- The authors use the results of these calculations to "conclude that
even if the source is classified as a BL Lac object, its optical
spectrum is compatible with the existence of an IR torus powerful
enough to provide the external photon field required for the
production of gamma rays needed to successfully explain its MWL SED."
- The authors conclude by stating "With this work, we can also confirm
the classification of S4 0954+65 as a BL Lac object, but close to the
limit and therefore, it seems to confirm that the target could be a
transitional object showing characteristics from both BL Lacs and
FSRQs. From the observed Mg II emission line the luminosity of the
disk, BLR and torus have been derived under certain commonly used
assumption for the covering factors. The results demonstrate that the
observed optical spectrum is compatible with the existence of a torus
luminous enough to provide the IR external photon field needed for the
production of gamma rays as required by the high CD MWL SED."
From
MAGIC Collaboration (2018):
- "The broadband spectrum can be modeled with an emission mechanism
commonly invoked for flat spectrum radio quasars, i.e. inverse Compton
scattering on an external soft photon field from the dust torus, also
known as external Compton. The light curve and SED phenomenology is
consistent with an interpretation of a blob propagating through a
helical structured magnetic field and eventually crossing a standing
shock in the jet, a scenario typically applied to flat spectrum radio
quasars (FSRQs) and low-frequency peaked BL Lac objects (LBL)."
In
Tavecchio (2016), when tallying the number of TeV
FSRQs, the following comment is made:
"I do not include in this list the blazar S4 0954+65, often considered
a FSRQ, since it is likely a BL Lac of unknown redshift (
Landoni et al. (2015))."
From
Tanaka et al. (2016):
"This object clearly meets the formal definition of a BL Lac (see
Table 35 and Fig. 8 of
Lawrence et al. 1996). However, its archival
(non-simultaneous) multi-wavelength spectral energy distribution (SED)
hints at the presence of a “blue bump†more typical of a FSRQ. Past
X-ray observation by ROSAT (e.g.,
Comastri et al. 1997) shows a
flatter energy distribution than typical for a radio-selected BL Lac
leading to the suggestion that S4 0954+65 may be a transition object
with properties that lie in between the BL Lac and FSRQ classes. This
idea has also been explored by
Ghisellini et al. (2011), who, however,
conclude that it should be classified as a LBL (a “low-peaked†BL Lac
object) based on the luminosity of the broad-line region in Eddington
units, rather than the emission lines’ equivalent width."
In their TeV discovery ATel, the MAGIC Collaboration referred to this
object as a FSRQ and hence it was classified thusly in TeVCat:
From
MAGIC Collaboration (2015):
- "The MAGIC collaboration reports the discovery of very high energy
(VHE; E>100 GeV) gamma-ray emission from the FSRQ S4 0954+65"
It has also been referred to as a FSRQ in many other ATels:
-
ATel 6709
-
ATel 6996
-
ATel 7001
-
ATel 7007
-
ATel 7046
-
ATel 7093
-
ATel 7750
-
ATel 8445
In all of the Fermi catalogues, however, it has been classified as a
BL Lac based on its spectral properties. When further subclassified it
was listed as an LSP in 3LAC and as an ISP in 1LAC:
-
3FGL
-
2FGL
-
1FGL
-
3LAC
-
2LAC
-
1LAC
-
2FHL
-
1FHL
It is also classified as a BL Lac in
CGRaBS by
Healey et al. (2008)
It is also classified as a BL Lac in
Veron-Cetty & Veron (2006)
From
Landoni et al. (2015):
- "This source was classified as a BL Lac object by
Walsh et al. (1984)
and exhibits all the properties of its class"
They also note the following:
"On the basis of a number of observable quantities such as the
apparent magnitude, point like images, featureless spectrum and their
gamma-ray emission, S4 0954+65 appears similar to few other bright BL Lacs
objects such as PG 1553+113 (R ∼ 14) and H 1722+119 (R ∼ 15,
Landoni et al. (2014))."
Distance:
The distance of z=0.368 that had been quoted here in TeVCat has been
called into question by
Landoni et al. (2015). We have
edited the redshift entry for this source accordingly (151012).
Update 25 November 2020: the redshift has been updated to z = 0.3694 +/- 0.0011
following the results of
Becerra Gonzalez et al. (2020) described below.
From
Becerra Gonzalez et al. (2020):
- "The observations of S4 0954+65 were carried out using the DOLORES
(Device Optimized for the LOw RESolution) spectrograph at TNG in long
slit configuration. Six observations were carried out using the LRB
grism."
- "We obtained consistent redshift estimates based on the strongest
emission lines detected on the spectra taken on 2015-05-21. Thus, the
estimated redshift of S4 0954+65 is z = 0.3694 +/- 0.0011 is derived
from the Mg II line, and the values z = 0.3667 +/- 0.0003 and
z = 0.3671 +/- 0.0003 are derived from the lines [OIII] and [OII],
respectively"
- "Therefore, our results confirm the previous redshift estimates from
Lawrence et al. (1986,
1996);
Stickel et al. (1993). Hence, the redshift
lower limit of z >= 0.45 derived more recently by
Landoni et al. (2015)
is ruled out based on the results on this work."
- the authors conclude by stating "a solid redshift determination of
z = 0.3694 +/- 0.0011 is established for this target"
From
Landoni et al. (2015):
- "Contrary to previous reports on the redshift, we found that the
optical spectrum is featureless at an equivalent width limit of ∼ 0.1
ÌŠAngstromsA. A critical analysis of the existing observations indicates
that the redshift is still unknown. Based on the new data we estimate
a lower limit to the redshift at z ≥ 0.45."
- "The first attempt to determine the redshift of this source was done
by
Lawrence et al. (1986) who proposed z = 0.367. Further optical
spectroscopy was then obtained by
Stickel et al. (1993) confirming
this redshift. However, the two determinations of the redshift are
mainly based on different spectral features casting some doubts on the
soundness of the proposed redshift. Moreover, we note that, in spite
of the low z, both
ground based imaging and HST observations
(
Scarpa et al. 2000;
Urry et al. 2000) failed to detect the underlying
diffuse emission from the host galaxy, suggesting a higher redshift
for this source.
Spectral Information:
From
MAGIC Collaboration (2018):
- Spectral index: 4.58 +/- 0.66(stat) +/- 0.15(syst)
Seen by: MAGIC
-
IXPE Observation of the Low-Synchrotron Peaked Blazar S4 0954+65 During An Optical-X-ray Flare
Kouch, Pouya M. et al., arXiv e-prints parXiv:2411.16868 (2024) [LINK]
-
Optical and Radio Variability of the Blazar S4 0954+658
Vlasyuk, V.V. et al., Astrophysical Bulletin 78 p464-486 (2023) [LINK]
-
The complex variability of blazars: Time-scales and periodicity analysis in S4 0954+65
Raiteri, C.M. et al., arXiv e-prints parXiv:2104.15005 (2021) [LINK]
-
Acceleration of high energy protons in AGN relativistic jets
Istomin, Ya. N. and Gunya, A.A., Phys. Rev. D 102 p043010 (2020) [LINK]
-
Optical spectral characterization of the the gamma-ray blazars S4 0954+65, TXS 1515-273 and RX J0812.0+0237
Becerra Gonzalez, J. et al., arXiv e-prints parXiv:2010.14532 (2020) [LINK]
-
Optical Variability of TeV Blazars on long time-scales
Gaur, H. et al., arXiv e-prints p (2019) [LINK]
-
The detection of the blazar S4 0954+65 at very-high-energy with the MAGIC telescopes during an exceptionally high optical state
MAGIC Collaboration et al., ArXiv e-prints p (2018) [LINK]
-
On the redshift of TeV BL Lac objects
Paiano, S. et al., ArXiv e-prints p (2017) [LINK]
-
Signature of Inverse Compton emission from blazars
Gaur, H. et al., ArXiv e-prints p (2017) [LINK]
-
A significant hardening and rising shape detected in the MeV/GeV nuFnu spectrum from the recently-discovered
very-high-energy blazar S4 0954+65 during the bright optical flare in 2015 February
Tanaka, Y.T. et al., ArXiv e-prints p (2016) [LINK]
-
The Extremes in Intra-Night Blazar Variability: The S4 0954+65 Case
Bachev, R. et al., Galaxies 4 p13 (2016) [LINK]
-
Discovery of Very High Energy Gamma-Ray Emission from the FSRQ S4 0954+65 with the MAGIC telescopes
Mirzoyan, R., The Astronomer's Telegram 7080 p1 (2015) [LINK]
-
Fermi LAT Detection of a Hard Spectrum Gamma-ray Flare from the FSRQ S4 0954+65
Ojha, R. et al., The Astronomer's Telegram 7093 p1 (2015) [LINK]
-
Violent intra-night optical variability of the blazar S4 0954+65 during its unprecedented 2015 February outburst
Bachev, R., ArXiv e-prints p (2015) [LINK]
-
What is the redshift of the gamma- ray BL Lac source S4 0954+65?
Landoni, M. et al., ArXiv e-prints p (2015) [LINK]
Want a reference added? Send a bibtex entry to
the TeVCat Team